(OES) California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program Review Checklist
Other
1. CalARP Program Review
Have you performed a self-audit for the CalARP program? (Note: This is not the same as the Title 27 self-audit requirements.) a) Describe any activities you have initiated to reduce the risk of accidental releases? b) How many facilities have you identified?
Details:
Line 4000 T19 2780.5(a) Line 4001 T19 2780.5(b) Line 4001 T19 2780.5(b)
2. CalARP Program Review
Have you made, or when do you plan on making, your risk determinations? If you have determined that a stationary source may pose an accident risk have you: a) requested the preparation and submission of any RMP? b) reclassified a covered process from program 2 to program 3? If you have determined that a stationary source does not pose a significant likelihood of and accident risk have you: a) exempted any stationary source from the RMP requirement? b) required an RMP be submitted and reclassified a covered process from program 3 to program 2 or program 2 to program 1?
Details:
Line 4026 HSC 25534 Line 4027 T19 2735.4(a)(2) Line 4027 T19 2735.4(e)(3) Line 4028 HSC 25534(b)(2)(A) Line 4028 HSC 25534(b)(2)(B)
3. CalARP Program Review
Describe your activities to coordinate and consult with the stationary sources in your jurisdiction. a) Did you consult with stationary source to determine the RMP submission date? b) Have your consulted with the stationary sources to determine the level of documentation required in the RMP? c) Have you consulted with stationary sources to select the appropriate methodology for the Hazard Review and/or Process Hazard Analysis? d) Have you coordinated with stationary sources regarding acceptance to use a model RMP?
Details:
Line 4037 T19 2745.1 Line 4046 T19 2735.5 Line 4046.1 T19 2755.2(b) & 2760.2(b) Line 4046.2 T19 2735.5(c)
4. CalARP Program Review
Do all submitted RMPs with Program level 2 or 3 contain an external event analysis in the Process Hazard Analysis or Hazard Review sections? a) If the magnitude or scope of the external events were unknown, did the stationary source work closely with your agency to determine what was required?
Details:
Line 4046 T19 2745.6(l) & T19 2745.7(q) Line 4046 T19 2745.6(q)(2)
5. CalARP Program Review
Have you initiated the RMP review process? If yes, have you: a) Published an initial public notice in a local newspaper stating that an RMP has been submitted and you have initiated the process for government and public review? b) Reviewed each RMP to determine if all the required elements are present? c) Accepted any RMP as complete and submitted the RMP for formal public review? d) Within 15 days of determining an RMP is complete, have you made the RMP available for public review and comment by publishing an announcement in a local newspaper? I. Did you allow 45 days for public review and comment of the RMP? e) Did you begin the evaluation review at the end of the public review period? I. Did you complete the evaluation review within 36 months for RMPs that included only Program 1 or Program 2 processes? II. Did you complete the evaluation review within 24 months for any RMPs that included Program 3 processes?
Details:
T19 2745.2 Line 4032 T19 2745.2(a)(2) Line 4032 T19 2745.2(a)(3) Line 4034 T19 2745.2(a)(3)(B) Line 4034 T19 2745.2(a)(4) Line 4034 T19 2745.2(a)(4) Line 4032 T19 2745.2(a)(5) Line 4032 T19 2745.2(a)(6)(A) Line 4032 T19 2745.2(a)(6)(B)