(OES) California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program Review Checklist
1. CalARP Program Review
Have you performed a self-audit for the CalARP program? (Note: This is not the same as the Title 27 self-audit requirements.)
a) Describe any activities you have initiated to reduce the risk of accidental releases?
b) How many facilities have you identified?
Details: Line 4000
2. CalARP Program Review
Have you made, or when do you plan on making, your risk determinations?
If you have determined that a stationary source may pose an accident risk have you:
a) requested the preparation and submission of any RMP?
b) reclassified a covered process from program 2 to program 3?
If you have determined that a stationary source does not pose a significant likelihood of and accident risk have you:
a) exempted any stationary source from the RMP requirement?
b) required an RMP be submitted and reclassified a covered process from program 3 to program 2 or program 2 to program 1?
Details: Line 4026
3. CalARP Program Review
Describe your activities to coordinate and consult with the stationary sources in your
a) Did you consult with stationary source to determine the RMP submission date?
b) Have your consulted with the stationary sources to determine the level of
documentation required in the RMP?
c) Have you consulted with stationary sources to select the appropriate methodology for
the Hazard Review and/or Process Hazard Analysis?
d) Have you coordinated with stationary sources regarding acceptance to use a model
Details: Line 4037
T19 2755.2(b) &
4. CalARP Program Review
Do all submitted RMPs with Program level 2 or 3 contain an external event analysis in the Process Hazard Analysis or Hazard Review sections?
a) If the magnitude or scope of the external events were unknown, did the stationary source work closely with your agency to determine what was required?
Details: Line 4046
T19 2745.6(l) &
5. CalARP Program Review
Have you initiated the RMP review process?
If yes, have you:
a) Published an initial public notice in a local newspaper stating that an RMP has been
submitted and you have initiated the process for government and public review?
b) Reviewed each RMP to determine if all the required elements are present?
c) Accepted any RMP as complete and submitted the RMP for formal public review?
d) Within 15 days of determining an RMP is complete, have you made the RMP
available for public review and comment by publishing an announcement in a local
I. Did you allow 45 days for public review and comment of the RMP?
e) Did you begin the evaluation review at the end of the public review period?
I. Did you complete the evaluation review within 36 months for RMPs that included only Program 1 or Program 2 processes?
II. Did you complete the evaluation review within 24 months for any RMPs that included Program 3 processes?
Details: T19 2745.2